Beşiktaş can pay 17 million to Abdullah Avcı - Turkish Super League

Beşiktaş can pay 17 million to Abdullah Avcı

Besiktas will pay 17 million to Abdullah Avci

The Arbitration Board of the Turkish Football Federation has decided to pay 17 million 130 thousand TL termination compensation to Abdullah Avcı, former coach of Beşiktaş Club. The board also upheld the fines given to Beşiktaş, Galatasaray and Göztepe clubs.

“The decisions taken at the meeting held today by the Arbitration Board are as follows:

“1. E.2021 / 134 – K.2021 / 182 Serkan Akal’s objection to the Central Arbitration Board’s decision dated 16.03.2021 was examined.

– The rejection of the request for a hearing,

– Acceptance of the application to be explained in the detailed reasoned decision; to send the file to the Central Arbitration Board to decide on the request, unanimously,

2. E.2021 / 159 – K.2021 / 183 Beşiktaş Futbol Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş.’s objection to the Dispute Resolution Board’s decision dated 06.02.2021 and numbered E.2020 / 363- K.2021 / 37 regarding the dispute between the technical man Abdullah Mucip Avcı. As a result of the negotiation;

– As a result of the deduction of 210.000 TL stated in the opposite vote letter in terms of the termination compensation amount of the UCK decision; To be corrected and approved as 17.130.000 TL,

– The rejection of the other objections of the defendant, – The legal expense, the attorney’s fee and other matters to be stated in the reasoned decision, unanimously,

3. E. 2021/183 – K.2021 / 184

Beşiktaş Futbol Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş., its Assistant Trainer Ozan Köprülü, its staff Cengizhan Öksüz and Berke Güler, and the objection of PFDK’s decision dated 14.05.2021 numbered E.2020-2021 / 1115 – K.2020-2021 / 1375 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;

– Beşiktaş Football Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş.’s members due to field events caused by FDT’s 52/2. As it is understood that there is no mistake in terms of legal qualification and the determination of the penalty in the penalty of 48.000,00 TL in accordance with the article, the application is rejected and the penalty is approved unanimously,

– Beşiktaş Football Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş., due to the illegal admittance of the stadium to the stadium, FDT’s 49/1. As it is understood that there is no mistake in terms of legal qualification and determination of the penalty in the penalty of 200.000,00 TL in accordance with the article, the application is rejected and the penalty is approved unanimously,

– Beşiktaş Football Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş.’s protocol tribune, due to violation of the instructions due to the fact that more than the number specified in the instruction, FDT’s 46/1. As it is understood that there is no mistake in terms of legal qualification and the determination of the penalty in the penalty of 48.000,00 TL in accordance with the article, the application is rejected and the penalty is approved unanimously,

– Beşiktaş Football Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş., due to violation of the instructions of the members of the protocol tribune not to comply with the social distance rule and the obligation to wear a mask, FDT’s 46/1. As it is understood that there is no mistake in terms of legal qualification and determination of the penalty in the punishment of 24.000,00 TL in accordance with the article, the application is rejected and the penalty is approved unanimously,

– Beşiktaş Football Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş.’s Assistant Coach Ozan Köprülü after the game, due to the fact that he was not accredited, entered the green background, the FDT’s 46/1. FDT’s 36/1-c and 35/4 due to unsportsmanlike action against the opponent team player. and in accordance with the 12th article of the FDT, the ban on entering the dressing room and the bench and a fine of 13,000.00 TL in 1 official competition, as it is understood that there is no mistake in terms of legal qualification and the determination of the penalty, the application is rejected and the penalty is upheld, unanimously

– Beşiktaş Football Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş.’s Officer Cengizhan Öksüz, after the competition, due to the fact that he was not accredited, entered the green background, the FDT’s 46/1. in accordance with Article 36/1-c of the FDT due to unsportsmanlike action against the opponent team player and 15 days of disenfranchisement through the application of Article 12 of the FDT, in terms of legal qualification and determination of the penalty. Since it is understood that there is no misstatement, the rejection of the application and the approval of the penalty, unanimously,

– Beşiktaş Football Yacht. Singing. ve Tic. A.Ş.’s Officer Berke Güler after the match was not accredited, due to violation of the instructions, FDT’s 46/1. in accordance with Article 44/1-c of the FDT and with the application of Article 12 of the FDT with 45 days of disenfranchisement due to the attack on the opponent team members, a lack of accuracy in terms of legal qualification and the determination of the penalty. Since it is understood that the application is rejected and the penalty is approved, unanimously,

4. E. 2021/184 – K.2021 / 185

Göztepe Sportif Yacht. A.S. The objection of PFDK to the decision dated 20.05.2021 and numbered E.2020-2021 / 1127 – K.2020-2021 / 1392 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;

– Göztepe Sporty Yacht. A.Ş.’s admission to the stadium irregularly, FDT’s 49/1. As it is understood that there is no mistake in terms of legal qualification and the determination of the penalty in the punishment of 50.000,00 TL in accordance with the article 13 of the FDT and the application of the 13th article of the FDT,

5. E. 2021/186 – K.2021 / 186

Galatasaray Sportif Sınai ve Tic. Yacht. A.S. The objection of PFDK to the decision dated 20.05.2021 and numbered E.2020-2021 / 1128 – K.2020-2021 / 1391 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;

– Galatasaray Sportif Sınai ve Tic. Yacht. A.Ş.’s admission to the stadium irregularly, FDT’s 49/1. As it is understood that there is no mistake in terms of legal qualification and determination of the penalty in the penalty of 200.000,00 TL in accordance with the article, the application is rejected and the penalty is approved unanimously,

– Galatasaray Sportif Sınai ve Tic. Yacht. A.Ş.’s members’ failure to comply with the obligation to wear a mask, and FDT’s 46/1. As it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of legal qualification and determination of the penalty, it was unanimously decided to approve the penalty with the rejection of the application. “

.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
Conquest celebrations started with the excitement of the 9th International Conquest Cup

Conquest celebrations began with the thrill of the ninth Worldwide Conquest Cup

Next Post
Fines against Altay, Samsunspor and Istanbulspor

Fines towards Altay, Samsunspor and Istanbulspor

Related Posts